Psychology Reader

Motor Development: Embodied, Embedded, Enculturated, and Enabling

Karen E. Adolph and Justine E. Hoch · 2019 · Annual Review of Psychology

Role
Major synthesis
Difficulty
Accessible
Full work length
24 pages
Type
Journal article

Access

Psychology Reader links to legitimate sources and does not host article PDFs.

Reading focus

Syllabus: How Do Infants Build Knowledge and Skills?

Broaden the dynamic-systems argument into a view of embodied, situated development. Follow one route through which a new action changes an infant’s encounters with objects or people, then distinguish that opportunity from a demonstrated downstream effect.

A question to consider. Two communities offer different opportunities for infants to move. What would you measure to study the developmental process without ranking one timetable as inherently better?

Why this reading

Reaching, sitting, and walking change what children can encounter and do. Adolph and Hoch connect motor development with bodies, environments, cultural practices, and opportunities for learning. Their synthesis makes a seemingly simple milestone into a question about the processes that produce an ability and its consequences.

Before you read

An affordance is an opportunity for action relative to a particular body and situation. A developmental cascade occurs when change in one domain alters opportunities in another. A correlation between two emerging abilities does not establish which causes the other, or whether another change contributes to both.

Read for

  1. Choose an example for each of the four terms in the title. Identify what would be missed by explaining the example through physical maturation alone.
  2. Compare evidence about the timing of milestones with evidence about how a skill is acquired. Does similar timing imply a common route?
  3. Track a proposed cascade from a motor skill to another domain. Which links are observed, experimentally manipulated, or inferred?

Consider afterwards

  1. A child begins walking and encounters more objects and people. Design a comparison that could separate the contribution of walking from changes in caregiver behavior and general development.

Editorial context

This review brings motor development into a broader account of psychological change. Its examples challenge a fixed timetable as a complete explanation, without implying that bodily constraints disappear. New actions can create opportunities, but an opportunity is not a guaranteed developmental outcome; subsequent experiences and social arrangements still matter.