Psychology Reader

What Do Implicit Measures Measure?

Michael Brownstein, Alex Madva, and Bertram Gawronski · 2019 · WIREs Cognitive Science

Role
Methodological contribution · Critical reappraisal
Difficulty
Challenging
Full work length
13 pages
Type
Journal article

Access

Psychology Reader links to legitimate sources and does not host article PDFs.

Reading focus

Syllabus: How Do Attitudes Form and Change?

Treat each task response as evidence that needs an interpretation, and compare competing interpretations.

Why you’re reading it. Make measurement a question to investigate before explaining formation or change.

A question to consider. If a library survey and a speeded task disagree, what would you need to know before deciding that one reveals the person's true attitude?

Why this reading

What does a faster response on a sorting task establish about a person? This review separates measured performance from the mental processes proposed to explain it.

Before you read

An indirect measure infers evaluation from a task rather than asking for it directly. The Implicit Association Test compares sorting speed and accuracy. Reliability concerns consistency; validity concerns the interpretation and use of a score.

Read for

  1. Distinguish the observed response from claims about awareness, associations, or beliefs.
  2. Compare stable characteristics, temporary states, and situational influences as explanations.
  3. Separate predicting another behavior from explaining why it occurs.

Consider afterwards

  1. A person's score changes between sessions. What evidence would distinguish attitude change, a context effect, and measurement error?

Editorial context

The authors advocate a way of organizing contested evidence, not a settled account of everything an indirect task measures. The review does not establish a diagnostic threshold for individuals. Forscher and colleagues' synthesis also cautions against assuming that changing implicit-task performance necessarily changes behavior.