Psychology Reader

Maintenance, Reserve and Compensation: The Cognitive Neuroscience of Healthy Ageing

Roberto Cabeza, Marilyn Albert, Sylvie Belleville, and 10 others · 2018 · Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Role
Major synthesis · Methodological contribution
Difficulty
Moderate
Full work length
10 pages
Type
Journal article

Access

Psychology Reader links to legitimate sources and does not host article PDFs.

Reading focus

Syllabus: How Do We Adapt as We Grow Older?

Use the definitions to ask what the sensory-cognitive association alone cannot tell us. Keep proposed mechanisms separate from the measures used as evidence for them.

A question to consider. If two older adults perform equally well but show different brain activity, what else would you need to distinguish reserve, maintenance, and compensation?

Why this reading

Terms such as reserve and compensation can name an observation without explaining it. This conceptual review asks what evidence would justify each interpretation of a brain and behavior finding.

Before you read

The authors distinguish accumulated neural resources, their preservation, and recruitment that helps meet a task's demands. An imaging measure is evidence about a process, not a direct reading of its purpose. A proxy, such as education, is not the resource itself.

Read for

  1. Use Figure 1 to compare the proposed processes and the timescales on which they operate.
  2. Explain why greater brain activity alone does not meet the authors' criteria for compensation.
  3. Ask which comparisons could distinguish initial differences in resources from their maintenance over time.

Consider afterwards

  1. Older adults recruit an additional brain region during a memory task. What evidence would justify calling that recruitment helpful compensation?

Editorial context

This is an Opinion article proposing clearer definitions, with continuing disagreement acknowledged. Its focus is cognitive neuroscience, not a complete model of well-being. Two 2018 notices accompany it: an author correction and a publisher correction reversing incorrectly colored age-group bars in Figure 3b. The linked university copy identifies both corrections.