Psychology Reader

Social Norms Interventions: Eight Common Pitfalls

Beniamino Cislaghi and Lori Heise · 2018 · Globalization and Health

Role
Critical reappraisal · Contemporary update
Difficulty
Accessible
Full work length
10 pages
Type
Journal article

Access

Psychology Reader links to legitimate sources and does not host article PDFs.

Reading focus

Syllabus: How Do Cultural Norms and Institutions Organize Behavior?

Use the pitfalls to identify when a behavior is constrained by expectations, material conditions, institutional rules or several of these together.

Why you’re reading it. Bring the syllabus’s explanations into a practical critique of intervention design.

A question to consider. A community wants fairer access to a shared resource: what would you learn about power, existing protective practices and material barriers before proposing a norms campaign?

Why this reading

Cislaghi and Heise explain why recognizing a social pattern is not enough to design an intervention. Their eight pitfalls connect norm theory with material constraints, power and community participation, showing where a norms-only account of behavior can fail.

Before you read

An attitude is a personal evaluation; a social expectation concerns other people. The prevalence of a behavior differs from the strength of a norm’s influence on it. People may comply because resources, institutions or relationships restrict their alternatives even when they dislike a practice.

Read for

  1. Examine the distinction between personal attitudes, shared expectations, common behavior and causal influence.
  2. Consider how protective practices, indirect norms, material barriers and unequal power alter the proposed route to change.

Consider afterwards

  1. A campaign changes reported approval but leaves behavior unchanged. What explanations would you investigate before calling it a failure of persuasion?
  2. How could describing a harmful practice as widespread unintentionally reinforce it, and what information would a community need instead?

Editorial context

This is a practical conceptual article drawing on social-norms research and experience in global health, not a trial comparing eight intervention components. Its examples motivate possible problems and design questions; they do not establish one universally effective programme. Community participation requires attention to who can speak, who defines improvement and who may face backlash. Norm-focused work must be considered alongside resources, services and institutional conditions rather than assuming that information alone enables people to act.