Psychology Reader

Narrative Identity

Dan P. McAdams and Kate C. McLean · 2013 · Current Directions in Psychological Science

Role
Major synthesis · Foundational argument
Difficulty
Accessible
Full work length
6 pages
Type
Journal article

Access

Psychology Reader links to legitimate sources and does not host article PDFs.

Reading focus

Syllabus: How Should We Understand Personality?

Notice what a narrative can add to a trait profile and how an interpretation becomes a coding decision.

Why you’re reading it. Include the person's own account while retaining questions about evidence and interpretation.

A question to consider. Sam tells the same career episode differently to a friend and an interviewer. What would you ask before treating either account as their defining identity?

Why this reading

A life story adds a kind of information that a trait score does not capture. This brief review introduces research on the meanings people give their experiences and makes narrative accounts available for systematic psychological inquiry.

Before you read

Narrative identity connects remembered experience with an imagined future. Researchers can code stories for features such as agency, connection, and meaning making. A coded story represents an account produced in a context, not an unfiltered record of a life.

Read for

  1. Use Table 1 to distinguish a story's content from the researcher's coding decisions.
  2. Compare evidence about narrative development with evidence linking narrative features and well-being.
  3. Notice what listeners and cultural contexts contribute, and where causal questions remain open.

Consider afterwards

  1. Two accounts describe the same career setback, one as a loss of belonging and one as a turning point. What would a coding scheme capture, and what could neither account establish about the event's causes?

Editorial context

This is a selective review, not a demonstration that everyone needs a redemptive story. The authors identify developmental exceptions and unresolved causality. Associations with well-being do not justify prescribing a positive interpretation of adversity. Assess the narrative, audience, and research setting before generalizing.