Psychology Reader

Attitudes and Attitude Change

Dolores Albarracín and Sharon Shavitt · 2018 · Annual Review of Psychology

Role
Major synthesis
Difficulty
Challenging
Full work length
29 pages
Type
Journal article

Access

Psychology Reader links to legitimate sources and does not host article PDFs.

Reading focus

Syllabus: How Do Other People and Social Situations Shape Us?

Connect each explanation of attitude change to its outcome and to the personal, social, or historical context involved.

Why you’re reading it. Introduce evaluations and persuasion without assuming that favorable opinions automatically produce corresponding action.

A question to consider. If members say they welcome newcomers but rarely include them, which attitude measure and behavioral observation would help explain the mismatch?

Why this reading

Attitudes are evaluations, but their formation and change involve more than arguments presented to an isolated person. This review connects evaluative judgments with values, emotions, relationships, cultural practices, and historical conditions.

Before you read

An attitude concerns favor or disfavor toward an object, person, action, or idea. A belief, an intention, and an observed action are different things. Explicit measures ask for a report; indirect measures infer evaluation from a response. Neither automatically reveals a single underlying truth.

Read for

  1. Compare attitudes understood as stored evaluations with attitudes constructed in context.
  2. Track whether each example measures an evaluation, an intention, or behavior, and how long any change lasts.
  3. Examine how the person, social relationships, and historical conditions provide different explanations for change.

Consider afterwards

  1. A campaign improves reported attitudes toward public transport, but ridership stays constant. What measurements would distinguish weak persuasion from practical barriers to action?

Editorial context

This review primarily covers research published in 2010–2017. It offers a broad organizing perspective rather than a current systematic audit of every finding cited. Its cultural and generational generalizations require attention to sampling and design. An indirect measure is not a personal diagnosis, and a changed evaluation does not establish durable behavioral change. Some statistical examples are demanding; the central task is to connect each claim to its measured outcome.