Psychology Reader

Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment

Robert B. Cialdini · 2003 · Current Directions in Psychological Science

Role
Foundational argument · Major synthesis
Difficulty
Accessible
Full work length
5 pages
Type
Journal article

Access

Psychology Reader links to legitimate sources and does not host article PDFs.

Reading focus

Syllabus: How Do Other People and Social Situations Shape Us?

Distinguish a message about what most people do from a message about what they approve.

Why you’re reading it. Move from a controlled judgment task to an explanation of everyday social expectations and communication.

A question to consider. How might saying that newcomers are often excluded undermine a campaign intended to include them?

Why this reading

A message can condemn a behavior while also telling its audience that many people do it. Cialdini distinguishes these two kinds of social information and uses environmental examples to explain why their combination matters.

Before you read

A descriptive norm concerns what people typically do; an injunctive norm concerns what they approve or disapprove. Salience is how strongly a feature attracts attention. A norm message can change perceived prevalence without changing approval.

Read for

  1. Use the clean-versus-littered setting comparison to distinguish attention to a norm from simply copying a model.
  2. Separate observed littering or theft from intentions to recycle.
  3. Examine the author's qualifications about mechanisms, alternative message features, and whether messages remain salient when action becomes possible.

Consider afterwards

  1. A notice says that many residents leave rubbish outside the bins. What two norm messages does it send, and what comparison would test a revised notice?

Editorial context

This short review combines experimental examples with interpretation of a public advertisement; it does not directly test every claim about the advertisement. The recycling path diagram concerns intentions and does not independently establish each causal arrow. Findings in particular environmental settings do not supply a universal rule for public communication. Accurate information and locally relevant outcomes remain necessary when testing a new message.