Psychology Reader

Understanding Adolescence as a Period of Social–Affective Engagement and Goal Flexibility

Eveline A. Crone and Ronald E. Dahl · 2012 · Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Role
Major synthesis · Foundational argument
Difficulty
Challenging
Full work length
15 pages
Type
Journal article

Access

Psychology Reader links to legitimate sources and does not host article PDFs.

Reading focus

Syllabus: What Changes During Adolescence?

Examine how social–affective engagement and flexible goals might support learning as well as vulnerability. Use the distinctions between age, puberty, and context to assess the model’s proposed connections.

A question to consider. What contrasting predictions would a general lack-of-control account and a context-sensitive motivation account make about adolescents helping peers?

Why this reading

Crone and Dahl examine adolescence through changing social motivations and flexible engagement with goals. Their proposal invites readers to ask when exploration creates opportunities and when it creates vulnerability.

Before you read

Social–affective processes connect social experience with emotion and motivation. Cognitive control concerns regulating thought and action. Puberty and chronological age are related but distinct.

Read for

  1. Contrast a developmental deficit explanation with a context-sensitive one. What observation would distinguish them?
  2. Separate findings from the proposed connections in Figure 3. Which arrows remain hypotheses?
  3. Ask whether a brain-activation difference identifies a mechanism or leaves competing interpretations.

Consider afterwards

  1. Design a comparison of adolescent and adult choices in two social contexts. What result would challenge the claim that one group simply has less control?

Editorial context

This 2012 review proposes a heuristic model, not a completed causal account. Its discussion of longitudinal and training studies complicates a simple equation between age, frontal activity, and maturity. Evaluate its predictions alongside alternative explanations; avoid turning an average neural difference into a fixed judgment about an individual’s capabilities.