Psychology Reader

What Changes During Adolescence?

Puberty, motivation, autonomy, identity, and sexuality in changing social worlds.

Level
Introductory
Reading load
9 core readings in 5 units
Prerequisites
No prior course in developmental psychology or neuroscience is required. The guides introduce the central concepts. How Do We Develop Across the Lifespan? introduces developmental explanations. How Do Relationships and Social Understanding Develop? provides useful background on families and peers.
Last reviewed
September 2026

Introduction

Adolescence brings changes whose calendars seldom coincide exactly. Young people of the same age may differ in puberty, responsibilities, opportunities, and what they seek from relationships. The same person may choose differently alone and among friends. To understand this period, we must attend to these variations as carefully as to its recurring patterns, and ask how bodily change meets a changing social world.

This path begins by asking what we mean by adolescence and how puberty is measured. It then compares an account of changing motivation with an experiment on peer observation. A review of family interactions considers how autonomy and connection can develop together. Work on identity, an ethnic–racial identity intervention, and a review of romantic and sexual development broaden the questions beyond risk taking. The final reading examines how schools and families can fit—or frustrate—changing needs.

Throughout, distinguish chronological age, pubertal processes, lived experience, and social expectations. Ask whether a result concerns differences between people or change within a person, and whether a proposed explanation has been tested. Culture and institutions belong in these questions from the start. Adolescence is neither one universal crisis nor a single biological countdown to adulthood.

Unit 1 of 5

What defines adolescence, and what does puberty measure?

A label such as adolescent combines biological changes with social arrangements. Choudhury questions the categories used in research; Shirtcliff and colleagues show why even puberty cannot be reduced to a single interchangeable measure. Together they establish what later explanations need to specify.

  1. Reading 1 of 9

    Culturing the Adolescent Brain: What Can Neuroscience Learn from Anthropology?

    Choudhury, S. (2010). Culturing the adolescent brain: What can neuroscience learn from anthropology? Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5(2–3), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsp030

    Foundational argument · Critical reappraisal · Moderate · Full work: 9 pages

    Use this argument to separate a developmental process from the categories used to study it. Consider how responsibilities, schooling, and cultural expectations could change the meaning of an age-group comparison.

    A question to consider. How would a study of growing independence differ if independence meant earning money for a household rather than making choices alone?

  2. Reading 2 of 9

    Pubertal Development: Correspondence Between Hormonal and Physical Development

    Shirtcliff, E. A., Dahl, R. E., & Pollak, S. D. (2009). Pubertal development: Correspondence between hormonal and physical development. Child Development, 80(2), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01263.x

    Methodological contribution · Moderate · Full work: 11 pages

    Turn the opening discussion of categories into a measurement problem. Compare age, physical development, self-perception, and hormones without assuming that one can stand in for all the others.

    A question to consider. If same-age adolescents make different decisions, what would you measure before attributing the difference to puberty?

Unit 2 of 5

Why can the same adolescent act differently across settings?

Development changes what attracts attention and feels rewarding as well as what a person can do. A conceptual review proposes a flexible, socially responsive account; an experiment offers a narrower test involving friends and risky choices. Keep the framework, the task result, and the neural interpretation distinct.

  1. Reading 3 of 9

    Understanding Adolescence as a Period of Social–Affective Engagement and Goal Flexibility

    Crone, E. A., & Dahl, R. E. (2012). Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective engagement and goal flexibility. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(9), 636–650. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3313

    Major synthesis · Foundational argument · Challenging · Full work: 15 pages

    Examine how social–affective engagement and flexible goals might support learning as well as vulnerability. Use the distinctions between age, puberty, and context to assess the model’s proposed connections.

    A question to consider. What contrasting predictions would a general lack-of-control account and a context-sensitive motivation account make about adolescents helping peers?

  2. Reading 4 of 9

    Peers Increase Adolescent Risk Taking by Enhancing Activity in the Brain’s Reward Circuitry

    Chein, J., Albert, D., O’Brien, L., Uckert, K., & Steinberg, L. (2011). Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain’s reward circuitry. Developmental Science, 14(2), F1–F10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01035.x

    Landmark empirical study · Challenging · Full work: 10 pages

    Apply the preceding framework to a concrete manipulation. Evaluate the behavioral age-by-context test separately from each age group’s result, then assess what the brain measurements add.

    A question to consider. Does a significant peer effect in adolescents and a nonsignificant effect in adults establish that the effects differ? Which comparison directly tests that claim?

Unit 3 of 5

How can autonomy grow within close relationships?

Changes in authority and responsibility occur through interactions. This unit asks how families negotiate those changes and why disagreement can have different meanings. Connection and autonomy need not be opposites, and neither conflict nor emotional distance is a compulsory milestone.

  1. Reading 5 of 9

    Development of Parent–Adolescent Relationships: Conflict Interactions as a Mechanism of Change

    Branje, S. (2018). Development of parent–adolescent relationships: Conflict interactions as a mechanism of change. Child Development Perspectives, 12(3), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12278

    Major synthesis · Foundational argument · Accessible · Full work: 6 pages

    Move from a brief experimental social context to relationships that develop over time. Ask how the way a disagreement unfolds might matter more than its frequency, while keeping cultural meanings of autonomy in view.

    A question to consider. How could you distinguish flexible negotiation from a family simply having fewer serious disagreements to resolve?

Unit 4 of 5

How do adolescents explore who they are and how they relate to others?

Identity includes commitments, belonging, and interpretations of experience. A review introduces change within individuals; an intervention tests opportunities for ethnic–racial exploration. The final paper brings romantic and sexual learning into the account. Gender identity, sexual orientation, attraction, and behavior are related questions, not interchangeable variables or a prescribed sequence.

  1. Reading 6 of 9

    Adolescent Identity Development in Context

    Branje, S. (2022). Adolescent identity development in context. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, Article 101286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.11.006

    Major synthesis · Contemporary update · Moderate · Full work: 6 pages

    Connect everyday family and peer interactions to exploration and commitment. Distinguish a person’s changes from their position relative to other people, and notice differences across identity domains.

    A question to consider. Could someone explore their cultural identity more while becoming more certain about educational plans? What would a single global identity score miss?

  2. Reading 7 of 9

    A Small-Scale Randomized Efficacy Trial of the Identity Project: Promoting Adolescents’ Ethnic–Racial Identity Exploration and Resolution

    Umaña-Taylor, A. J., Douglass, S., Updegraff, K. A., & Marsiglia, F. F. (2018). A small-scale randomized efficacy trial of the Identity Project: Promoting adolescents’ ethnic–racial identity exploration and resolution. Child Development, 89(3), 862–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12755

    Methodological contribution · Moderate · Full work: 9 pages

    Examine one attempt to make identity exploration possible through structured social experience. Assess what randomizing classrooms establishes and what remains uncertain about the proposed route from exploration to resolution.

    A question to consider. What would have to be checked before expecting the same curriculum and measures to work in another country’s schools?

  3. Reading 8 of 9

    Becoming a Sexual Being: The ‘Elephant in the Room’ of Adolescent Brain Development

    Suleiman, A. B., Galván, A., Harden, K. P., & Dahl, R. E. (2017). Becoming a sexual being: The ‘elephant in the room’ of adolescent brain development. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2016.09.004

    Foundational argument · Major synthesis · Moderate · Full work: 12 pages

    Extend the unit to romantic and sexual development as learning and relationship formation. Examine the fit between biological models and diverse human experiences, including differences in gender, orientation, interest, and timing.

    A question to consider. What would a study miss if it measured development only by first intercourse, rather than also asking about meanings, mutual consent, attraction, and relationships?

Unit 5 of 5

How do institutions shape the opportunities to develop?

The final reading brings the strands together around schools and families. If capacities, motivations, and responsibilities change, the environments surrounding adolescents may need to change too. Evaluate this proposal through specific comparisons rather than assuming that either age or institutions explain everything.

  1. Reading 9 of 9

    Development During Adolescence: The Impact of Stage–Environment Fit on Young Adolescents’ Experiences in Schools and in Families

    Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage–environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90

    Foundational argument · Major synthesis · Moderate · Full work: 12 pages

    Use stage–environment fit to connect motivation, autonomy, identity, and context. Compare changing students with changing classrooms, and distinguish evidence for a mismatch from evidence for a particular remedy.

    A question to consider. How would you investigate a fall in motivation across a school transition while separating age, puberty, teaching practices, and changing peer groups?

Scope and omissions

This is an introductory path through adolescent development, not an exhaustive survey. It gives distinct attention to puberty measurement, motivation and peer context, family autonomy, personal and ethnic–racial identity, romantic and sexual development, and institutions. Reviews supply frameworks; empirical papers offer bounded opportunities to examine them.

Gender identity and sexual orientation enter the core as distinct dimensions that research must measure, but this path does not provide a comprehensive account of gender development or LGBTQ+ lives. Detailed work on sleep, digital media, adolescent mental health, disability, employment, and political participation also lies beyond this sequence. The optional works deepen historical debates, identity research, sexuality, and cross-context evaluation.

Several empirical settings are Western and school-based. Treat that as a limit on generalization. Adolescence has varied social boundaries, and the readings do not establish one correct timetable for independence, identity commitments, relationships, or adulthood.

Synthesis

Adolescence takes shape through the interaction of pubertal processes, changing motivations, relationships, identities, and institutions. Chronological age gives these changes a rough order without explaining their connections. The readings make room for learning, attachment, autonomy, and opportunity alongside difficulty. Their central demand is to explain an observed change while allowing that an average pattern may describe no particular young person completely.

Imagine that a fifteen-year-old becomes less engaged at school, more invested in friends, and more willing to challenge family decisions. Construct three competing explanations: one involving pubertal processes, one involving changing motivations or identity, and one involving the opportunities and expectations of the surrounding settings. Specify measures that distinguish the explanations rather than merely giving the same observation different labels.

Then design a study. What would repeated observations of this person add to an age-group comparison? Which contextual change could be tested experimentally, and which causal questions would remain? Explain how you would learn what the person’s relationships and responsibilities mean in their setting, and avoid assuming that their trajectory represents all adolescents.

The central achievement is to explain change across interacting processes without treating an average pattern as an individual verdict. An account of adolescence should be able to address learning, connection, and opportunity as well as difficulty.

Continue with How Do We Develop in Early and Middle Adulthood? to examine adult identities, work, relationships, caregiving, and changing goals in the circumstances that make different lives possible.

For a wider perspective on continuity and change, return to How Do We Develop Across the Lifespan?. To examine the selection and changing influence of friends in more depth, revisit How Do Relationships and Social Understanding Develop?.

Further reading

Optional. Not part of the core sequence.

  • Arnett, J. J. (1999). Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered. American Psychologist, 54(5), 317–326. Paper. A historical reassessment of conflict, mood, and risk; compare its proposed general tendencies with variation across people and settings.
  • Worthman, C. M., & Trang, K. (2018). Dynamics of body time, social time and life history at adolescence. Nature, 554(7693), 451–457. Paper. A life-history perspective on biological and social timing, including education and changing routes to adult roles.
  • Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., Bell, K. L., & O'Connor, T. G. (1994). Longitudinal assessment of autonomy and relatedness in adolescent-family interactions as predictors of adolescent ego development and self-esteem. Child Development, 65(1), 179–194. Paper. An earlier observational approach to autonomy alongside connection; compare its measures and longitudinal claims with Branje’s framework.
  • Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551–558. Paper. A foundational operationalization of exploration and commitment; examine the sampling and the limits of treating statuses as fixed kinds of people.
  • Diamond, L. M. (2008). Female bisexuality from adolescence to adulthood: Results from a 10-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 5–14. Paper. A longitudinal examination of sexual identity, attraction, and behavior that complicates assumptions of one uniform trajectory.
  • Abdullahi, A. K., Syed, M., Juang, L. P., Berne, S., Hwang, C. P., & Frisén, A. (2024). Evaluating a school-based intervention on adolescents’ ethnic-racial identity in Sweden. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 53(11), 2423–2442. Paper. A later evaluation of the Identity Project in another setting; compare intervention delivery, outcome measures, and the pattern of findings.