Psychology Reader

Universal Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems

Mark Dingemanse, Seán G. Roberts, Julija Baranova, and 9 others · 2015 · PLOS ONE

Role
Methodological contribution · Major synthesis
Difficulty
Moderate
Full work length
15 pages
Type
Journal article

Access

Psychology Reader links to legitimate sources and does not host article PDFs.

Reading focus

Syllabus: How Does Culture Shape Perception, Thought and Communication?

Follow how locally understood repair sequences become comparable categories, and examine the inference from their form to collaborative effort.

Why you’re reading it. Complete the path with a method for studying understanding as a joint activity.

A question to consider. How would you investigate whether a repair pattern found among friends also applies when someone is speaking to an authority figure?

Why this reading

Dingemanse and colleagues compare how people signal and resolve misunderstandings in conversation. Their study makes both common organization and contextual variation visible through systematically coded everyday interaction.

Before you read

Other-initiated repair begins when a recipient signals trouble with what someone has said or signed. The repair initiator and the response that resolves the problem form a sequence.

Read for

  1. Examine how conversations are sampled and locally interpreted before they become comparable data.
  2. Distinguish observations about repair forms and their length from explanations in terms of cooperation.

Consider afterwards

  1. What would count as a counterexample to a proposed shared principle of repair?
  2. How might the pattern change in a classroom or an exchange between strangers?

Editorial context

The corpus covers informal interaction among family and friends in twelve languages, including a sign language. It is diverse but not a probability sample of all communication. Coder calibration used a common English dataset, which leaves further questions about cross-language equivalence. Utterance length is a proxy for interactional cost; cooperative motives and species-wide universality require arguments beyond the observed associations.