Psychology Reader

Five Levels of Self-Awareness as They Unfold Early in Life

Philippe Rochat · 2003 · Consciousness and Cognition

Role
Foundational argument · Major synthesis
Difficulty
Moderate
Full work length
15 pages
Type
Journal article

Access

Psychology Reader links to legitimate sources and does not host article PDFs.

Reading focus

Syllabus: How Do Relationships and Social Understanding Develop?

Separate bodily awareness, self-identification, and awareness of others’ evaluations. Carry forward the attachment unit’s distinction between an observable response and the broader capacity or relationship inferred from it.

A question to consider. How would you distinguish a child’s awareness of being seen by others from recognizing a familiar image of themselves?

Why this reading

Recognizing a reflection is only one possible meaning of knowing oneself. Rochat distinguishes bodily awareness, self-identification, and awareness of how others see us. The framework helps readers ask which meaning a particular observation supports.

Before you read

Proprioception provides information about the position and movement of one’s body. Mirror self-recognition is usually inferred from behavior directed toward a mark on one’s own body. An implicit distinction can guide behavior without a person verbally describing it.

Read for

  1. Explain what changes between differentiation, situation, identification, permanence, and self-consciousness.
  2. For one example, separate the observed behavior from its interpretation as self-awareness. Consider an alternative.
  3. Examine how the account relates developmental emergence to adults moving between forms of awareness. Are these mutually exclusive stages?

Consider afterwards

  1. A child notices a mark in a mirror but does not touch it. What additional observations would make that response more informative?

Editorial context

This is a theoretical synthesis, not a validated universal timetable. Broesch and colleagues’ cross-cultural study questions treating absence of mark-directed behavior as absence of self-recognition. Its proposed social explanations also require further testing. Rochat’s historical illustrations and age claims should be evaluated separately from the usefulness of his conceptual distinctions.